{"id":13584,"date":"2026-07-27T21:51:55","date_gmt":"2026-07-27T13:51:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/raymonvalve.com\/product\/scotch-yoke-actuator\/"},"modified":"2026-07-27T22:35:47","modified_gmt":"2026-07-27T14:35:47","slug":"scotch-yoke-actuator","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/raymonvalve.com\/it\/product\/scotch-yoke-actuator\/","title":{"rendered":"Attuatore a forcella scozzese"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
Engineering scope<\/div>\n

What controls a responsible Scotch Yoke Actuator selection<\/h2>\n

A Scotch Yoke Actuator is evaluated for integrated automated valve operation. The valve, actuator, mounting kit, controls and feedback devices are specified, assembled and function-tested as one tagged package.<\/p>\n

Use the name as a starting point. Technical approval still depends on high-output quarter-turn actuator torque profile and fail-safe spring design, the complete service envelope, installed interfaces and measurable acceptance.<\/p>\n

\n
Scotch Yoke<\/strong><\/p>\n

High-output quarter-turn actuator torque profile and fail-safe spring design. Define valve torque curve, supply pressure, fail direction, stroke time, mounting, environment and safety factor.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Order-specific boundary<\/strong><\/p>\n

Website content is not tag-level certification. Suitability and supplied scope are established only by the accepted quotation, datasheet and drawing.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
Specification workflow<\/div>\n

Close the questions hidden behind the product description<\/h2>\n

Record the question, accepted answer and proof so the Scotch Yoke Actuator proposal can be audited across disciplines.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Review area<\/th>\nEngineering question<\/th>\nRequired record<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Package responsibility<\/td>\nOne approved scope must identify valve, actuator, controls, tubing, wiring and documentation boundaries.<\/td>\nCapture the selection basis, approved deviation if any and the record used for acceptance.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Safety action<\/td>\nFail state, trip logic, reset method and partial-stroke requirements must be defined.<\/td>\nFreeze the accepted value in the tag datasheet and verify it on the approved drawing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Interfaces<\/td>\nPower, air, signal, hazardous-area and communication interfaces require project coordination.<\/td>\nCapture the selection basis, approved deviation if any and the record used for acceptance.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Testing<\/td>\nFunctional, fail-action and interface checks must use approved acceptance criteria.<\/td>\nState the measurable requirement and connect it to a drawing, procedure or test result.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Scotch Yoke<\/td>\nDefine valve torque curve, supply pressure, fail direction, stroke time, mounting, environment and safety factor.<\/td>\nCapture the selection basis, approved deviation if any and the record used for acceptance.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Record exact standard designations and contract editions; resolve scope gaps and purchaser options before manufacture.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
Application boundaries<\/div>\n

Failure exposures behind the nominal configuration<\/h2>\n

Component nameplates alone do not prove package performance; assembly-level testing and records are required. Also review orientation, transients, cycling, contamination, access and consequences of internal or external leakage.<\/p>\n

\n
Process envelope, contaminants, phase behavior and every case that can govern the Scotch Yoke Actuator<\/div>\n
Required valve function, operating frequency, shutoff criterion and failure consequence<\/div>\n
Nominal interface plus the flange\/weld details, flow direction, face-to-face and operator envelope<\/div>\n
Body, trim, seat, packing, bolting, lining or coating materials as applicable<\/div>\n
Worst-case torque\/thrust, cycle duty, travel time, fail behavior, minimum utility and control accessories<\/div>\n
Applicable standards, pressure tests, special tests, inspection points and final documents<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
Evidence and quality<\/div>\n

Use order records\u2014not generic certificates\u2014for acceptance<\/h2>\n

A certificate or report is useful only when its scope traces to the actual tag, materials and configuration. Use the valve standards guide<\/a> to separate product, rating, dimensional, end-connection and test scope.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Design basis<\/h3>\n

Controlled configuration, interface drawing, calculations and closed technical clarifications.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Material identity<\/h3>\n

Pressure and wetted-part traceability plus welding, heat treatment, hardness and inspection evidence.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Inspection and tests<\/h3>\n

Approved ITP, procedures, calibrated instruments, results, witness records and NCR closeout.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Actuator output must be checked throughout travel, not only at the endpoints.<\/p>\n

Do not infer certification or guaranteed performance from this page. Accept only the order-specific evidence required by the purchaser.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
RFQ checklist<\/div>\n

Build a comparable inquiry for this valve configuration<\/h2>\n

A useful RFQ combines process data, piping class, construction and materials, operator\/actuator requirements, acceptance criteria and delivery documents.<\/p>\n

For a Scotch Yoke Actuator, also highlight high-output quarter-turn actuator torque profile and fail-safe spring design. List unresolved assumptions as deviations instead of embedding them silently in the offer.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Turn the datasheet into a clarified quotation basis<\/h2>\n

Provide the actual application; the response will separate confirmed requirements from assumptions and identify the checks still required.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Submit Your Datasheet<\/a>Compare Valve Automation Package Options<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
\n
Related engineering route<\/div>\n

Continue the selection review<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n

Product family<\/h3>\n

Compare the main constructions and selection boundaries in this valve family.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Project Valve Review<\/h3>\n

Resolve interacting pressure, temperature, corrosion, wear or project risks.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Testing and inspection<\/h3>\n

Define pressure-test scope, acceptance, instruments, witness points and records.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\n
FAQ<\/div>\n

Scotch Yoke Actuator questions<\/h2>\n
\n
\nWhat information is required to select a Scotch Yoke Actuator?<\/summary>\n

Provide the medium and composition, all pressure and temperature cases, nominal size, flow or differential pressure where relevant, required function, end connections, materials, shutoff criterion, operation, standards, inspection and documentation. For this configuration, the review must specifically address high-output quarter-turn actuator torque profile and fail-safe spring design.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nWhich standards apply to a Scotch Yoke Actuator?<\/summary>\n

The answer depends on the product construction, project jurisdiction and purchaser specification. A product standard may cover design scope while separate standards govern pressure-temperature rating, dimensions, ends, pressure testing, fire safety, emissions or materials. Actuator output must be checked throughout travel, not only at the endpoints.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nHow should Scotch Yoke Actuator pressure and leakage testing be specified?<\/summary>\n

Define the test configuration and measurable acceptance rather than requesting a generic factory test. Include calibrated instruments, valve position, pressure direction and tag-linked results.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nCan a Scotch Yoke Actuator be supplied with an actuator?<\/summary>\n

Yes when the valve\/actuator interface and load cases are engineered together. Define safe state, utility loss, speed, frequency, accessories, feedback, interlocks and assembly-level testing.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nWhen should a Scotch Yoke Actuator not be selected?<\/summary>\n

Do not select it when its qualified construction cannot satisfy the process, shutoff, materials, dynamics, maintenance or documentation requirements. Component nameplates alone do not prove package performance; assembly-level testing and records are required. The alternative should be chosen only after comparing the complete service duty.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n